Abstract
Reduction of chemical fertilizers and effective use of livestock excrement are required for the realization of sustainable agriculture and reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The purpose of this study was to estimate the reduction rate of GHG emissions represented by comparing global warming potential (GWP) using organic fertilizers instead of chemical fertilizers. The study was conducted in a managed grassland on Andosol in southern Hokkaido for 3 years from May 2017 to April 2020. There were five treatment plots: no fertilizer, chemical fertilizer, manure, slurry, and digestive fluid. Organic fertilizers were applied such that the amount of NPK did not exceed the recommended application rate, and the shortage was supplemented with chemical fertilizers. Fluxes in CO2 caused by heterotrophic respiration (RH), CH4, and N2O were measured using the closed chamber method. Net ecosystem carbon balance (NECB) was obtained as net primary production + organic fertilizer application—RH—harvest. The GWP was estimated by CO2 equivalent NECB and CH4 and N2O emissions in each treatment. Chemical fertilizer nitrogen application rates in the organic fertilizer treatments were reduced by 10% for manure, 19.7% for slurry and 29.7% for digestive fluid compared to chemical fertilizer only, but the grass yields were not significantly different among the fertilizer treatments. The 3-year NECB showed significantly smallest carbon loss in manure treatment, and smaller carbon loss in the organic fertilizer treatments than in the chemical fertilizer only. The reduction rate in the GWP with use of organic fertilizers relative to that of chemical fertilizer was 16.5% for slurry, 27.0% for digestive fluid, and 36.2% for manure. The NECB accounted for more than 90% of the GWP in all treatments. CH4 emissions were < 0.1% of the GWP. On the other hand, N2O emissions accounted for more than 5% of the GWP, and was larger in the order of slurry > chemical fertilizer only > digestive fluid > manure. As a conclusion, these organic fertilizers can be used without no reduction of crop yield instead of chemical fertilizer, however, manure is the best way to increase soil carbon and to decrease GWP, followed by digestive fluid.
Highlights
The anthropogenic impact on the climatic system has increased annually, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in 2018 reached a record high of 55.3 Gt CO2 eq yr−1 (UNEP, 2019)
The water-filled pore space (WFPS) was significantly lower in the no-fertilizer plot and the slurry plot in 2019, and there was no significant difference among the other treatment plots
The fact that there was no significant difference in the grass yield between the chemical fertilizer treatment and the organic fertilizer treatments (Figure 6) was that the fertilizer application design was correctly performed using a combination of chemical and organic fertilizers without significantly increasing nitrogen loss of the organic fertilizer compared to that of the chemical fertilizer (Sawamoto et al, 2010; Mori and Hojito, 2015)
Summary
The anthropogenic impact on the climatic system has increased annually, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in 2018 reached a record high of 55.3 Gt CO2 eq yr−1 (UNEP, 2019). 24% of the GHG emissions come from agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU) (IPCC, 2014). Mitigation in the AFOLU sector is urgently needed. Soil is the largest carbon storage pool, approximately twice the amount of carbon in the atmosphere and three times the amount in terrestrial biomass (Schlesinger and Jeffrey, 2000). Agriculture is the largest source of CH4 and N2O (Blandford and Hassapoyannes, 2018). Improvement of carbon storage in farmland and reduction of CH4 and N2O emissions from farmland are important as climate change mitigation measures in agriculture
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
