Effects of three regeneration methods on the growth and bacterial community diversity of Populus × euramericana.

Abstract

To study the effects of different regeneration methods on the growth and bacterial community diversity of Populus × euramericana cv. ‘74/76’ (poplar 107), we investigated the growth of poplar 107 trees under three regeneration methods in 2017 and 2020, and sequenced the 16S rDNA V5–V7 regions in stem endophytic, root endophytic, and rhizosphere soil bacteria present in samples from the three regeneration methods using the Illumina high-throughput sequencing platform. The growth analysis showed that stump grafting regeneration (ST) and stump sprouting regeneration (SP) presented similar tree height and diameter at breast height (DBH), which were significantly lower by planted seedling regeneration (CK). The high-throughput sequencing results showed that the rhizosphere soil bacteria appeared to be significantly more diverse and rich than the root and stem endophytic bacteria. Cluster analysis showed that the similarity of bacterial community structure among the rhizosphere soil, root, and stem was small. Thus, the three sample types showed significant differences in bacteria. While comparing the two years, 2020 was significantly more diverse and rich than 2017. With the increase in stand age, the abundance of Proteobacteria increased and the abundance of Acidobacteria decreased. Among the three regeneration methods, ST significantly increased the diversity of stem endophytic bacteria. Chthoniobacter was enriched in SP, which promoted the decomposition of organic matter, and more plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) were accumulated in the rhizosphere of SP and ST. The composition of the bacterial community was similar in the three regeneration methods, but the community composition was different. Regeneration and transformation of poplar plantations can be better carried out by stump grafting and stump sprouting.