Abstract

While the internal load factors of whole-body vibration training have been widely investigated, the study of external load magnitude has been overlooked. Thus, the aim of the present study was to evaluate differences in whole-body vibration stimulus magnitude between static/dynamic whole-body vibration training at various vibration conditions. Four Pro 5 Plate vibration platforms were exposed to twelve different vibration conditions and a triaxial USB Impact X250-2 accelerometer was used to measure platform acceleration during each condition. Paired samples t-test was calculated to evaluate differences among amplitude, frequency, time of acceleration and time of deceleration of each platform at each vibration condition and during static (squat of 90° knee flexion) or dynamic exercise (from stand to 90° knee flexion squat). Also, the intra-class correlation coefficients were examined in order to assess the inter-instrument reliability. Peak-to-peak amplitude, frequency, time of acceleration and deceleration of the vibration platform were not modified by the type of exercise performed. Moreover, the four platforms tested showed high repeatability values during the execution of free vibration, static or dynamic squat in all vibration conditions. This study confirms that the vibration delivered by the Pro 5 Plate vibration platform is not modified during the realization of static or dynamic exercises.

Highlights

  • Training effects of whole-body vibration (WBV) have been widely investigated in several target groups

  • The results of this study show that mechanical stimulation of the Pro 5 Plate is not modified by the type of exercise performed

  • Recent studies have analyzed if the stimulus provided by the WBV platforms during exercises correspond to that pretends to be

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Training effects of whole-body vibration (WBV) have been widely investigated in several target groups. Meta-analysis showed WBV benefits for performance and health in muscle power [1], squat jump (SJ) height [2], counter movement jump (CMJ) height [2, 3], muscle strength [4,5,6], knee extension muscle strength [3], bone mineral density (BMD) [7], and balance ability and mobility [8, 9] These effects over the organism adaptation could depend on the WBV load [1, 2, 4]. All recently cited studies are focused on the internal load, and few of them are focused on the external load [20], it is not always the one intended [21, 22]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call