Abstract

When applying axial load on piles subjected to negative skin friction (NSF), the yielded NSF is gradually eliminated. The process is notably influenced by the tip location (Y) and still a lack of understanding. This paper reports three-dimensional numerical simulations with tip locations Y = 1.00 pile diameter (D), 0.25D, 0.00D, and −1.00D. It is found that, against expectations, the dragload and NSF are not proportionally related to the tip location. When maximum dragload (P max) is eventually eliminated due to an axial load, there is also a negative crest of the skin friction, indicating that NSF still exists based on the criterion of the dragload reduction. The side resistance of the piles with Y = 1.00D and 0.25D is almost fully mobilised, which is demonstrated by the increment of end resistance that greatly increases with the larger axial loads. However, the side resistance of the piles with Y = 0.00D and −1.00D has a potential capacity to carry more loads with continued displacement since the increment of end resistance increases almost linearly with axial load. Therefore, when designing the pile foundation, the inclusion of the NSF should be governed by the amount of axial load to be resisted.

Highlights

  • Negative skin friction (NSF) due to the surrounding soil settling more than the pile has been reported by many researchers, who examined the NSF that occurs under the application of a surcharge load [1], withdrawal of the groundwater table [2], and/or soil consolidation [3]

  • NSF is caused by the withdrawal of the groundwater table on piles carrying a tall building, the behaviour of NSF is heavily governed by the tall building

  • Three-dimensional numerical analyses are performed to investigate the effects of the tip location on piles subjected to surcharge and axial loads by considering the occurrence of the dragload and NSF, the elimination of the dragload and NSF, the variation of the pile capacity, and the load transfer mechanisms

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Negative skin friction (NSF) due to the surrounding soil settling more than the pile has been reported by many researchers, who examined the NSF that occurs under the application of a surcharge load [1], withdrawal of the groundwater table [2], and/or soil consolidation [3]. Several centrifuge tests have been conducted on piles subjected to surcharge and axial loads These tests focus on the applied load conditions lack of considering the effects of the tip location [2, 3, 12]. As it is well-known, the tip location significantly affects the load transfer mechanism of piles subjected to NSF [13, 14]. It governs the occurrence and elimination of the dragload and NSF, which is still a lock of understanding.

Numerical Simulations
Verification of the Numerical Modelling
Results
Effects of the Tip Location on Piles Subjected to a Surcharge Load
Effects of the Tip Location on Piles Subjected to Surcharge and Axial Loads
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call