Abstract
Thirty experienced blood donors and 30 nondonors were shown a videotape of a blood-donation event. They were later questioned about the event in either a cognitive interview or a structured interview. Results show that interviewees in the cognitive-interview condition recalled significantly more correct and incorrect information as compared with interviewees in the structured interview, whereas no overall differences were found between the familiarity conditions. Analyses with regard to script-inconsistent and omitted script-consistent and relevant details revealed that blood donors produced significantly more intrusion errors as compared with nondonors
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
