Abstract

Typically, the coding strategies of cochlear implant audio processors discard acoustic temporal fine structure information (TFS), which may be related to the poor perception of interaural time differences (ITDs) and the resulting reduced spatial hearing capabilities compared to normal-hearing individuals. This study aimed to investigate to what extent bilateral cochlear implant (BiCI) recipients can exploit ITD cues provided by a TFS preserving coding strategy (FS4) in a series of sound field spatial hearing tests. As a baseline, we assessed the sensitivity to ITDs and binaural beats of 12 BiCI subjects with a coding strategy disregarding fine structure (HDCIS) and the FS4 strategy. For 250 Hz pure-tone stimuli but not for broadband noise, the BiCI users had significantly improved ITD discrimination using the FS4 strategy. In the binaural beat detection task and the broadband sound localization, spatial discrimination, and tracking tasks, no significant differences between the two tested coding strategies were observed. These results suggest that ITD sensitivity did not generalize to broadband stimuli or sound field spatial hearing tests, suggesting that it would not be useful for real-world listening.

Highlights

  • For patients suffering from bilateral severe to profound hearing loss, the implantation of cochlear implants (CIs) is a state of the art treatment

  • This study aimed to investigate to what extent bilateral cochlear implant (BiCI) recipients can exploit interaural time differences (ITDs) cues provided by a temporal fine structure information (TFS) preserving coding strategy (FS4) in a series of sound field spatial hearing tests

  • This study presents a comprehensive analysis to what extent BiCI users can exploit ITD cues provided by a TFS coding strategy (FS4) in a series of sound field spatial hearing tests

Read more

Summary

Introduction

For patients suffering from bilateral severe to profound hearing loss, the implantation of cochlear implants (CIs) is a state of the art treatment. A possible factor could be the coding strategy, as it defines a) at: Hearing Research Laboratory, ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 50, Bern 3008, Switzerland, ORCID: 0000-0003-4584-6096. The standard coding strategy for CI users can be dated back to 1991 and the introduction of the continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) coding strategy by Wilson et al (1991). In this strategy, bandpass filters split the preamplified signal into frequency bands. The high definition continuous interleaved sampling (HDCIS) strategy, which was investigated in this study, is a proprietary MEDEL (Innsbruck, Austria) implementation of the CIS coding strategy (Wilson et al, 1991)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call