Abstract
ABSTRACT Fixed‐kernel density estimates using radiotelemetry locations are frequently used to quantify home ranges of animals, interactions, and resource selection. However, all telemetry data have location error and no studies have reported the effects of error on utilization distribution and area estimates using fixed‐kernel density estimators. We simulated different home range sizes and shapes by mixing bivariate‐normal distributions and then drawing random samples of various sizes from these distributions. We compared fixed‐kernel density estimates with and without error to the true underlying distributions. The effects of telemetry error on fixed‐kernel density estimates were related to sample size, distribution complexity, and ratio of median Circular Error Probable to home range size. We suggest a metric to assess the adequacy of the telemetry system being used to estimate an animal's space use before a study is undertaken. Telemetry location error is unlikely to significantly affect fixed‐kernel density estimates for most wildlife telemetry studies with adequate sample sizes.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.