Abstract

The cerebellum is critically involved in the adaptation mechanisms that maintain the accuracy of goal-directed acts such as saccadic eye movements. Two categories of saccades, each relying on different adaptation mechanisms, are defined: reactive (externally triggered) saccades and voluntary (internally triggered) saccades. The contribution of the medio-posterior part of the cerebellum to reactive saccades adaptation has been clearly demonstrated, but the evidence that other parts of the cerebellum are also involved is limited. Moreover, the cerebellar substrates of voluntary saccades adaptation have only been marginally investigated. Here, we addressed these two questions by investigating the adaptive capabilities of patients with cerebellar or pre-cerebellar stroke. We recruited three groups of patients presenting focal lesions located, respectively, in the supero-anterior cerebellum, the infero-posterior cerebellum and the lateral medulla (leading to a Wallenberg syndrome including motor dysfunctions similar to those resulting from lesion of the medio-posterior cerebellum). Adaptations of reactive saccades and of voluntary saccades were tested during separate sessions in all patients and in a group of healthy participants. The functional lesion of the medio-posterior cerebellum in Wallenberg syndrome strongly impaired the adaptation of both reactive and voluntary saccades. In contrast, patients with lesion in the supero-anterior part of the cerebellum presented a specific adaptation deficit of voluntary saccades. Finally, patients with an infero-posterior cerebellar lesion showed mild adaptation deficits. We conclude that the medio-posterior cerebellum is critical for the adaptation of both saccade categories, whereas the supero-anterior cerebellum is specifically involved in the adaptation of voluntary saccades.

Highlights

  • The cerebellum is a key structure in the control and sensorimotor adaptation mechanisms of saccadic eye movements (Glickstein et al 2011)

  • As expected [see e.g. (Alahyane et al 2007)], the latency was longer for voluntary saccades than for reactive saccades

  • The gain of ipsilesional reactive saccades was significantly higher for both superior cerebellar artery (SCA)– antero-inferior cerebellar artery (AICA) patients (Kruskal–Wallis test = 7.7, p < 0.05; Dunnett test, p < 0.001) and Wallenberg patients (Kruskal–Wallis test = 4.8, p = 0.09; Dunnett tests, p < 0.05)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The cerebellum is a key structure in the control and sensorimotor adaptation mechanisms of saccadic eye movements (Glickstein et al 2011). Saccades triggered by exogenous cues, like the sudden appearance of a new object, belong to the category of reactive saccades. To explore our visual environment, we most frequently generate scanning saccades which are triggered according to internal goals and which belong to the voluntary saccades category. Regarding the adaptation mechanisms maintaining saccade accuracy (so-called saccadic adaptation), several behavioural studies have highlighted that they differ for reactive and voluntary saccades, but they did not test the neural substrates underlying this difference (Alahyane et al 2007; Collins and Dore-Mazars 2006; Cotti et al 2007; Cotti et al 2009; Deubel 1995; Erkelens and Hulleman 1993; Fujita et al 2002; Zimmermann and Lappe 2009)

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call