Abstract
Background: A new fitness trend incorporates stability exercises that challenges trunk muscles and introduces crawling as an exercise, but has yet to be investigated for muscle activity. Purpose: To compare the effects of static (STA), stationary (STN), and traveling (TRV) trunk exercises on muscle activation of the rectus abdominis, rectus femoris, external oblique, and erector spinae using surface electromyography (EMG). Methods: Seventeen recreationally active women (mean age ± SD = 22.4 ± 2.4 years, body mass 62.9 ± 6.9 kg, height 165.1 ± 5.8 cm) and twenty-three men (23.6 ±3.9 years, 83.2 ±17.1 kg, 177.1 ± 9.1 cm) volunteered to participate in this study. Subjects performed maximal voluntary contractions for normalization of each muscle’s EMG activity. They then performed the three exercises in random order for thirty seconds each with a two-minute rest in between. Results: For the rectus abdominis, STA was significantly lower than STN (P = 0.003) and TRV (P = 0.001). For the external oblique, STA was significantly lower than STN (P = 0.001) and TRV (P = 0.001) and STN was significantly greater than TRV (P = 0.009). For the erector spinae and rectus femoris, STA was significantly lower than STN (P = 0.001) and TRV (P = 0.001) Conclusions: There was greater muscle activation in all muscles tested in the stationary and traveling exercises versus the static. Strength and conditioning coaches and allied health professionals could potentially use stationary and traveling forms of trunk stabilization exercises as a viable strategy to increase muscle activation.
Highlights
The advancement in research and application of trunk exercises has benefited therapists, trainers, and coaches to improve sports performance, reduce injury risk, and in rehabilitation of their athletes or patients (McGill, 2010; Wheeler, 2015)
There was a significant difference in skinfold thickness for the rectus femoris between men and women (P = 0.017)
No significant differences in skinfold thickness were found between men and women for external oblique (P = 0.788), erector spinae (P = 0.884), or rectus abdominis (P = 0.864)
Summary
The advancement in research and application of trunk exercises has benefited therapists, trainers, and coaches to improve sports performance, reduce injury risk, and in rehabilitation of their athletes or patients (McGill, 2010; Wheeler, 2015). Research has shown the most effective and safest method to train the trunk is a stabilization exercise, where a neutral spine is maintained against a load (Mendrin, Lynn, Griffith-Merritt, & Noffal, 2016) This is due to increased knowledge that the most common function of the trunk is to prevent motion rather than initiate movement, and the trunk muscles should be trained as stabilizers rather than prime movers (McGill, 2010). For the erector spinae and rectus femoris, STA was significantly lower than STN (P = 0.001) and TRV (P = 0.001) Conclusions: There was greater muscle activation in all muscles tested in the stationary and traveling exercises versus the static. Strength and conditioning coaches and allied health professionals could potentially use stationary and traveling forms of trunk stabilization exercises as a viable strategy to increase muscle activation
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Kinesiology and Sports Science
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
