Abstract

Background: Traditionally, stretching protocols are basic components of warm-up aiming to improve performance and reduce injuries. However, the literature suggests that different stretching protocols during warm-up may have diverse effects on performance. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the acute effects of three different stretching protocols on force sense, dynamic flexibility, reaction time and movement time. Methods: The study included twenty-five participants who were TaeKwonDo young male players (age = 11.78 ± 1.66 years.). All the participants performed one of the following protocols on different days: (a) 5 min jogging followed by 3 min Static Stretching (SS), (b) 5 min jogging followed by 3 min Dynamic Stretching (DS), and (c) 5 min jogging followed by 3 min of rest (NS). After the protocols, the participants performed the following measurements: (a) force-matching test at 20% maximal isometric voluntary contraction (force sense), (b) active straight leg raise test (dynamic flexibility) and (c) reaction and movement time test. Results: Repeated measures analysis of variance revealed no significant main effects on force sense. Furthermore, SS performed significantly better in dynamic flexibility in comparison to NS, and DS performed significantly better in terms of dynamic flexibility and movement time compared to SS. Conclusion: According to the results of the study, it seems that force sense is not affected by either SS or DS protocols (30 sec duration per muscle group). Moreover, it seems that DS in the warm-up is more appropriate than SS for activities requiring dynamic flexibility and movement time.

Highlights

  • Athletes used to follow pre-activity routines which include various stretching modes, because this activity thought to improve athletes’ performance and reduce the chance of injuries [1]

  • According to the results of the study, it seems that force sense is not affected by either Static Stretching (SS) or Dynamic Stretching (DS) protocols (30 sec duration per muscle group)

  • It seems that DS in the warm-up is more appropriate than SS for activities requiring dynamic flexibility and movement time

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Athletes used to follow pre-activity routines which include various stretching modes (e.g. static stretching exercises), because this activity thought to improve athletes’ performance and reduce the chance of injuries [1]. The stretch-induced decreases in force have been attributed to two mechanisms: (a) changes in the musculotendinous unit (mechanical factors) and (b) impairments in neural output (i.e. decreased motor unit activation and altered reflex sensitivity) [8]. Force sense is considered to be a component of proprioception and is defined as the ability to accurately reproduce a given force during a voluntary contraction [10]. This sense of force enables us to estimate the magnitude of force production appropriate for the performance of a task. Stretching protocols are basic components of warm-up aiming to improve performance and reduce injuries. The literature suggests that different stretching protocols during warm-up may have diverse effects on performance

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call