Abstract
Composite flours were formulated from wheat flour and additives containing high amylose starch, resistant starches of RS2 and RS3 types, and barley β-glucan. Different parameters of flours, doughs, and final breads were evaluated. Almost all composite flours had significantly worse parameters as flour and dough in comparison to control. Sensory parameters of breads were also lower, though loaves supplemented with up to 15% (w/w) of high amylose starch (Hylon® VII), RS2 (Hi-maize™ 260), and RS3 (Novelose® 330) were considered as acceptable, with higher content of RS observed. Loaves with β-glucan (Barliv™ barley betafiber) were not acceptable either in sensory or technological parameters.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
