Effects of spermine on the detection of induced forward mutation at the can1 locus in yeast: Evidence for selection against canavanine-resistant mutants

Abstract

The effect of exogenous spermine tetrahydrochloride (0.5 mg/ml) on hydrazine- and nitrous acid-induced forward mutation to canavanine resistance ( CAN1 → cna1, normal to defective arginine permease) was examined in stationary-phase haploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Post-treatment cell division (specifically DNA replication) is required for hydrazine mutagenesis at this locus, whereas nitrous acid mutagenesis exhibits, in addition, asignificant post-treatment-independent component. Spermine addition only during mutagenic treatments in buffer did not affect mutagen cytotoxicity, but did not result in a slight yet consistent decrease in induced mutation frequencies. Addition of spermine to the yeast extract-peptone-dextrose (YEPD) post-treatment growth medium resulted in dramatic reductions of induced mutation frequencies, which could be alleviated by pregrowth in spermine-containing YEPD. Such a medium was found to cause an apparent temporary growth inhibition for almost 40 h, after which the growth rate of the culture increased rapidly. Cultures “recovering” from spermine inhibition were no longer inhibitable by spermine in fresh medium, suggesting an outgrowth of spontaneous and/or induced spermine-resistant derivatives. Genetic analysis of one isolated revealed a single dominant nuclear gene conferring resistance by some means other than defective spermine uptake. Growth of this mutant was only slightly inhibited by spermine (20% increase in doubling time), while mutation expression remained high. Results of competitive growth experiments indicated that spermine-containing YEPD exerted a selection pressure against canavanine-resistant cells, while YEPD by itself did not. The mechanism for this selection is not presently understood. With respect to replication-dependent induced mutation at CAN1, our initial observation of a strong apparent antimutagenic action of spermine was found to be best explained by this specific selection against can1 mutants. This underscores the need for caution in the interpretation of experiments designed to study physiological modification of mutagenic potential.