Abstract

Various remote sensing methods, including diffuse and contact reflectance spectroscopy (DRS and CRS, respectively) as well as proximal soil sensing (PSS), have been widely used for obtaining information about the soil properties. The influence of soil surface roughness on soil spectra obtained with a FieldSpecPro (ASD) spectroradiometer using three measurement techniques was investigated. The PSS spectra in outdoor (PSS-O) and laboratory (PSS-L) conditions were collected and then compared with the spectra of the same soil recorded using Muglight (ML) adapter. PSS measurements of each soil sample were taken at three surface roughness levels: the lowest roughness level, representing the rolled surface, the second representing a moderately rough (MR) surface of medium-sized clods and aggregates, and the third level with the highest soil surface roughness, where the clods and aggregates, with size beyond their assessed mean size for a given soil. The roughness indices height standard deviation (HSD) and tortuosity ( $\mathbf{T}_\mathbf{3D}$ ) were closely related to the size of the aggregates and clods forming the soil surface. The ML spectra of ground samples were more strongly correlated with the PSS-L spectra than with the PSS-O spectra, and mean coefficient of determination ( $\mathbf{R}^\mathbf{2}$ ) for the spectra obtained at three levels of roughness was 0.99 and 0.95, respectively. With the increase of surface roughness, the differences between the level of ML and both PSS-L and PSS-O spectra increased. The relative difference (RD) calculated for PSS-L and PSS-O spectra in relation to ML spectra was better explained by the $\mathbf{T}_\mathbf{3D}$ ( $\mathbf{R}^{\mathbf{2}} = \mathbf{0.82}$ ), than the HSD ( $\mathbf{R}^{\mathbf{2}} = \mathbf{0.68}$ ).

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call