Abstract

The effects of NiO, ZnO, and CuO sintering additives (0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 wt%) on the sintering behaviour, effective acceptor concentration, and hydration thermodynamics are examined for BaZr0.4Ce0.4Y0.1Yb0.1O3−δ and BaZr0.4Ce0.4Y0.2O3−δ proton conducting electrolytes. Thermogravimetry of hydration shows that the sintering additives – except for 0.5 wt% CuO – lead to a decrease in the effective acceptor concentration, and the decrease per mole sintering additive is the largest for NiO. The absence of typical secondary phases such as BaY2NiO5 and the homogeneous distribution of Ni determined from elemental mapping imply that sintering additives dissolve into the perovskite lattice. Exsolution of metallic Ni and Cu upon reduction leads to a substantial recovery of the effective acceptor concentration. Subsequent oxidation is accompanied by a repeated decrease in the effective acceptor concentration as the sintering additives appear to re-dissolve. Defect chemical reactions are proposed to explain the observed results and these are supported by energetics from first principles calculations. Overall, NiO has the highest positive impact on densification and grain growth, and a relatively small amount of 0.5 wt% NiO or CuO is preferable to optimise both sintering and hydration.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.