Abstract

Rationale We evaluated the effects of usual clinically recommended doses of fexofenadine (FEX), montelukast (ML), and FEX+ML combination, compared to placebo (PL), on nasal adenosine monophosphate (AMP) challenge in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR). Methods 12 PAR patients were randomized in a double-blind, crossover fashion to receive for 1 week, either FEX 180 mg, ML 10 mg, FEX 180 mg + ML 10 mg combination, or PL, with nasal AMP challenge performed 12 hours after dosing. The primary outcome was measurement of peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) made over a 60-minute period after nasal challenge with a single 400 mg/ml dose of AMP. Domiciliary total nasal symptoms were measured as a secondary outcome. Results There was significant attenuation ( p<0.05) of the mean maximum % PNIF fall from baseline after nasal AMP challenge vs. PL: 48, with FEX: 37; 95%CI for difference (2–20), ML: 35 (4–22), and FEX+ML: 32 (7–24). The area under the 60-minute time-response curve (AUC %.min) was also significantly attenuated ( p<0.05) vs. PL: 1893, with FEX: 1306 (30–1143), ML: 1246 (214–1078), and FEX+ML: 1153 (251–1227). There were no significant differences for FEX vs. ML vs. FEX+ML comparing either the maximum or AUC responses. The total nasal symptom score (out of 12) was also significantly improved ( p<0.05) vs. PL: 3.3, with FEX: 2.1 (0.3–2.0), ML: 2.0 (0.5–1.9), and FEX+ML: 2.5 (0.1–1.4). Conclusion FEX and ML as monotherapy significantly attenuated the response to nasal AMP challenge and improved nasal symptoms compared to PL, while combination therapy conferred no additional benefit.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.