Abstract

Several studies have reported the effects of short-term immobilization of the upper limb on the excitability of the primary motor cortex. In a report examining the effects of upper limb immobilization on somatosensory information processing using somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs), short-term upper limb immobilization reduced the amplitude and increased the latency of the P45 component recorded over the contralateral sensorimotor cortex of SEPs. However, the effects of upper limb immobilization on other regions involved in somatosensory information processing are unknown. Therefore, we investigated the effects of short-term right upper limb immobilization on sensory information processing, particularly in motor-related areas, by measuring the cortical components of SEPs. We also evaluated the excitability of the primary motor cortex and corticospinal tract as well as motor performance (visual simple reaction time and pinch force) related to these areas. All subjects were divided into two groups: the SEP group, in which the effects of upper limb immobilization on the excitability of somatosensory processing were investigated, and the transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) group, in which the effects of upper limb immobilization on the excitability of the corticospinal tract and primary motor cortex were investigated. Motor performance was evaluated in all subjects. We showed that 10-h right upper limb immobilization increased the cortical component of SEPs (N30) in the SEP group and decreased the excitability of the corticospinal tract, but not of the primary motor cortex, in the TMS group. The pinch force decreased after upper limb immobilization. However, the visual simple reaction time did not change between pre- and post-immobilization. The supplementary motor area and premotor cortex are believed to be the source of the N30. Therefore, these results suggest that upper limb immobilization affected somatosensory information processing in motor-related areas. Moreover, 10-h right upper limb immobilization reduced the excitability of corticospinal tracts but not that of the primary motor cortex, suggesting that circuits outside the M1, such as the intra- and inter-hemispheric inhibitory and facilitatory circuits rather than circuits within the M1, may be responsible for the reduced excitability of the central nervous system after restraint.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call