Effects of Selection for Increased Body Weight, Egg Production, and Shank Width on Developmental Stability in Turkeys

Abstract

Bilateral asymmetry was measured at 20 wk of age for shank length, shank width (width laterally at the dew claw), shank depth (width perpendicular to the dew claw), and face length (between auditory canal opening and the posterior junction of the upper and lower mandible) in three randombred control lines and three selected lines of turkeys. The data were based on 50 or 51 individuals per line and sex subgroup from a single hatch. The lines were grown intermingled with the sexes being grown in different houses. The selected lines had been selected for increased egg production (38 generations), increased 16-wk BW (32 generations), or increased shank width (19 generations) and had a higher level of inbreeding (average = 36.9%) than the randombred controls (RBC; average = 11.6%). The bilateral differences (right minus left) were analyzed for the presence of fluctuating asymmetry (FA; zero signed mean with normal variation), directional asymmetry (DA; signed mean not zero with normal variation), and antisymmetry (AS; zero mean with non-normal distribution). In order to adjust for possible scaling effects, relative asymmetry (RA), in which the mean of the absolute differences between sides was divided by the mean of the two sides and the resulting value was multiplied by 100, was used as a measure of bilateral asymmetry. The randombred control and selected lines were contrasted to study the effect of homozygosity on RA. Likewise, the large-bodied lines (F, FL, and RBC3) were contrasted to the small-bodied lines (RBC1, E, and RBC2) to study the effect of BW on RA.Only two types (FA and DA) of asymmetry were observed in the present study. The level of asymmetry for the traits was ranked as follows: face length > shank width = shank depth > shank length. The individual lines differed in RA for shank length and shank width for both sexes and for shank depth and face length in females. In general, the influence of BW, as measured in the contrast of large-bodied and small-bodied lines, on RA was larger than that of homozygosity, as measured by the contrast of the selected and randombred control lines.