Effects of Scale, Question Location, Order of Response Alternatives, and Season on Self-Reported Noise Annoyance Using ICBEN Scales: A Field Experiment.

Mark Brink,Danielle Vienneau,Nicole Probst-Hensch,Christian Cajochen,Dirk Schreckenberg,Jean-Marc Wunderli,Martin Röösli

doi:10.3390/ijerph13111163

Abstract

The type of noise annoyance scale and aspects of its presentation such as response format or location within a questionnaire and other contextual factors may affect self-reported noise annoyance. By means of a balanced experimental design, the effect of type of annoyance question and corresponding scale (5-point verbal vs. 11-point numerical ICBEN (International Commission on Biological Effects of Noise) scale), presentation order of scale points (ascending vs. descending), question location (early vs. late within the questionnaire), and survey season (autumn vs. spring) on reported road traffic noise annoyance was investigated in a postal survey with a stratified random sample of 2386 Swiss residents. Our results showed that early appearance of annoyance questions was significantly associated with higher annoyance scores. Questionnaires filled out in autumn were associated with a significantly higher annoyance rating than in the springtime. No effect was found for the order of response alternatives. Standardized average annoyance scores were slightly higher using the 11-point numerical scale whereas the percentage of highly annoyed respondents was higher based on the 5-point scale, using common cutoff points. In conclusion, placement and presentation of annoyance questions within a questionnaire, as well as the time of the year a survey is carried out, have small but demonstrable effects on the degree of self-reported noise annoyance.

Highlights

The reaction or emotion of being annoyed by noise can hardly be observed in a person directly, but must be assessed via self-reports
It appears plausible that further differences in annoyance responses between studies are generated by factors such as those which have been studied in our field experiment
Our findings suggest that between-study methodological differences are so large that conclusions about influencing factors that affect annoyance should only be based on within-study comparisons

Summary

Introduction

The reaction or emotion of being annoyed by noise can hardly be observed in a person directly, but must be assessed via self-reports. The responses to annoyance questions in a survey may be affected by the methodological approach itself, e.g., by the way the noise topic is presented, and by factors such as the sequencing of annoyance questions, the wording of a question, the choice and order of response alternatives, and many others. Small changes in design, wording, item positioning, and survey context or season may introduce variance of annoyance ratings which compromises. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 1163; doi:10.3390/ijerph13111163 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion