Effects of salinity, hypophysectomy, and prolactin on whole-animal transepithelial potential in the tilapia Oreochromis mossambicus

Abstract

We have examined whether two recently isolated forms of tilapia ( Oreochromis mossambicus) prolactin exert similar effects on osmoregulatory physiology. The effects of salinity, hypophysectomy, and replacement therapy with tilapia prolactins on whole-animal transepithelial potential (TEP), gill Na +, K +-ATPase activity, and plasma ions were determined. When intact fish adapted to 25% seawater (SW) were transferred to different salinities, TEP reached a steady state after 10 hr; TEP increased with increasing salinity from fresh water (FW) to 75% SW but was stable from 75 to 125% SW. Plasma osmolality, [Na +], and [Cl −] of these fish 24 hr after salinity change showed that fish in 100 and 125% SW had greater osmotic perturbation than those transferred to lower salinities. Following a 5-day recovery period in 25% SW, hypophysectomized fish transferred to FW for 10 hr had significantly lower TEP and plasma ion levels than either sham-operated fish or intact fish under the same conditions. Injection of hypophysectomized fish with “small” prolactin (tPRL 177), “large” prolactin (tPRL 188), or a combination of both (0.5 μg/g body weight) 22 hr and again 20 min prior to transfer from 25% SW to FW, restored TEP and plasma ion levels to those of sham-operated fish. Neither prolactin affected the TEP or plasma ions of sham-operated (intact) fish. Hypophysectomized fish had lower gill Na +, K +-ATPase activity than sham-operated fish in FW, but prolactin injections as described above did not affect gill Na +, K +-ATPase activity in either hypophysectomized or sham-operated fish. Our results indicate that the two forms of prolactin are indistinguishable with regard to several aspects of tilapia osmoregulation.