Effects of row spacing and sowing rate on vertical distribution of photosynthetically active radiation, biomass, and grain yield in winter wheat canopy.

Abstract

To clarify the effects of row spacing and sowing rate on the vertical distribution of canopy PAR, biomass, and grain yield in winter wheat, a field experiment was conducted without increa-sing water and fertilizer input. There were two row spacing modes, R1 (equal spacing, 20 cm+20 cm) and R2(wide and narrow row spacing, 12 cm+12 cm+12 cm+24 cm), and three sowing rates, D1 (low, 120 kg·hm-2), D2 (medium, 157.5 kg·hm-2), D3 (high, 195 kg·hm-2). The canopy photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) interception and utilization rate in different heights, population photosynthetic capacity, biomass, and grain yield were measured during the main growth stages of winter wheat. The results showed that both total PAR interception and upper layer PAR interception of winter wheat canopy under R1 treatment were significantly higher than those in R2 treatment, but those of the middle layer and lower layer were higher in R2 than in R1, and with significant difference in the middle layer. From flowering to maturity, the photosynthetic potential (LAD), population photosynthetic rate (CAP), PAR conversion rate, and utilization rate in R2 were all significantly higher than those in R1 under the same sowing rate, with the highest value under R2D2 treatment. With the increasing sowing rate, the population biomass (BA) and leaf biomass (BL) at different layers increased, but the individual biomass (BP) showed an opposite trend. Under the same sowing rate, BA, BL and BP in R2 were higher than that in R1 after the flowering stage. Among them, BA and BP had significant difference in row spacing treatments at the maturity stage, with significant difference between the two row spacing treatments being observed in BL of the middle and lower layers under D2 and D3 sowing rates. The spike number, grain number per spike, 1000-kernel weight, and grain yield of winter wheat among different treatments were the highest in R2D3, R2D1, R2D1, and R2D2, respectively. The 1000-kernel weight, grain number per spike and grain yield in R2 treatment were significantly higher than R1. In summary, the PAR interception in the middle and lower layers of winter wheat canopy was improved by changing row spacing, with positive consequence on the photosynthetic capacity of individual plant and population, PAR utilization and transformation efficiency, which finally increased biomass and grain yield. Therefore, optimizing the field structure and shaping the ideal population photosynthetic structure should pay more attention during the high-yield cultivation of winter wheat. Making full use of light resources per unit land area and excavating the photosynthetic production potential of crops were also critical to achieve high yield and efficiency. In this experiment, the population photosynthetic capacity, photosynthetic effective radiation utilization rate, and yield were the highest under the treatment of R2D2.