Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of reverse headgear (RH) on pharyngeal airway morphology in two groups of Class III patients with different vertical craniofacial features in comparison with an untreated Class III group. Seventeen subjects (9 males, 8 females; mean age 11.3 ± 0.98 years) with optimum vertical growth and 17 subjects (10 males, 7 females, mean age 11.5 ± 1.1 years) with a vertical growth pattern treated with a removable intra-oral appliance and a Delaire type facemask were included. An untreated Class III control group of 11 subjects (8 males, 3 females, mean age 9.1 ± 1.1 years) was included to compare the treated groups. The paired t-test for intragroup and one-way ANOVA for intergroup comparisons were performed. The relationships between changes in the craniofacial morphology and airway were assessed by Spearman correlation analysis. The airway dimensions at the adenoid side and soft palate were increased in the treatment groups compared to the control group (p < 0.05). The nasopharyngeal area demonstrated a significant difference in normodivergent and control subjects (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found in the airway morphology due to different vertical features. The effect of RH treatment on the sagittal airway dimensions revealed no significant difference between different vertical craniofacial features in the short term.

Highlights

  • Maxillary advancement by reverse headgear (RH) has been a major treatment option in young skeletal Class III patients,[1,2] providing enhancement of maxillary growth and restraint and/or redirection of mandibular growth.[3]

  • The beneficial effects of RH on the upper airway dimensions have been demonstrated in previous studies.[4,5,6]

  • The SN-PP angle decreased at Reverse Headgear normodivergent (RH-ND) group

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Maxillary advancement by reverse headgear (RH) has been a major treatment option in young skeletal Class III patients,[1,2] providing enhancement of maxillary growth and restraint and/or redirection of mandibular growth.[3].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call