Abstract

Retention forestry has been used for over 20years to reduce the unfavorable impacts of intensive forest management on biodiversity. The assumed positive effects of retention trees, however, depend on the dynamics of trees in providing substrates or structures for forest-dwelling organisms. In 2000 an experimental study was established to investigate the effects of different retention levels (10m3ha−1 and 50m3ha−1) and fire on tree dynamics. In total, 2758 individually marked, initially living, retention trees were followed on 12 sites in eastern Finland over 10 post-harvest years. Over half (59%) of the total volume of the retention trees died during these initial 10years, and burning resulted in much higher mortality (84% vs. 34% on unburned sites). At lower retention levels, retention trees did not provide continuity of habitat substrates since all trees died quickly. Fire shortened the tree availability, due to increased tree mortality. However, in higher retention levels, burned areas maintained diverse deadwood substrates for an extended period. Our study proved that tree retention can maintain the continuity of dead wood over early successional stages, if the level of retention is high enough. Fire, combined with higher retention level, created diverse assemblages of dead and living trees. At lower retention levels, however, the effect of fire can be too severe for maintaining living trees or continuity of diverse dead wood.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.