Abstract

Simple SummaryThe high prevalence of gastrointestinal diseases in young rabbits is the major cause of impediment in the development of the rabbit industry. Presently, few companies have adopted methods of restricting feeding to improve the survival rate independent of the effect on their growth and development. To explore the effects of different feeding-restriction levels on the growth performance, intestinal immunity, and skeletal muscle development of meat rabbits, 198 New Zealand meat rabbits of 35 days old were selected and randomly divided into three groups: (1) a control group, (2) a 15% feeding restriction group, and (3) a 30% feeding restriction group, with 66 in each group with an equal number of males and females. The growth performance measurement and health-risk assessment indicators, measurement of digestive enzyme activity, immune and antioxidant indexes, and regulation mechanism were evaluated and explored. Finally, we found that a 30% feeding limit affected the growth and development of skeletal muscle in growing rabbits by regulating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway.This study aimed to explore the effects of different feeding restriction levels on the growth performance, intestinal immunity, and skeletal muscle development of meat rabbits. Additionally, we studied whether complete compensatory growth could be obtained post 2 weeks of restricted feeding, in order to seek a scientific mode of feeding restriction. Each of three groups was exposed to 3 weeks of feeding restriction and 2 weeks of compensatory growth. The 15% feeding restriction showed a negligible effect on the final body-weight of the rabbits (p > 0.05), but significantly reduced the feed-to-weight ratio (p < 0.05); reduced diarrhea and mortality; and increased digestive enzyme activity and antioxidant capacity. However, a 30% feeding-restriction level substantially reduced the growth rate of the rabbits (p < 0.05), impaired skeletal muscle development, and showed no compensatory growth after 2 weeks of nutritional recovery. Additionally, immunoglobulin and antioxidant enzyme synthesis were impaired due to reduced nutritional levels, and levels of pro-inflammatory factors were increased during the compensation period. The IGF1 mRNA expression decreased significantly (p < 0.05), whereas MSTN and FOXO1 expression increased noticeably (p < 0.05). Moreover, protein levels of p-Akt and p-p70 decreased significantly in the 15% feeding restriction group. Overall, the 15% feeding limit unaffected the weight and skeletal muscle development of rabbits, whereas the 30% feeding limit affected the growth and development of skeletal muscle in growing rabbits. The PI3K/Akt signaling pathway is plausibly a mediator of this process.

Highlights

  • Restricted feeding is the approach to limit the calorie intake to attain particular digestive and physiological characteristics depending on the growth and development of an individual [1]

  • There was no significant difference in body weight between the restricted-feeding group I and the control group at the end of both the restricted feeding trial and the compensation trial (p > 0.05)

  • During the restricted feeding period, the feed-to-weight ratio of the restricted-feeding group I and group II were significantly lower than the control group (p < 0.05)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Restricted feeding is the approach to limit the calorie intake to attain particular digestive and physiological characteristics depending on the growth and development of an individual [1]. Regardless of retaining the advantages such as reduced diarrhea and low mortality in young rabbits, the excessive nutritional restriction can lead to reduced growth and low performance of rabbits [3]. One study showed that feed restriction in Hubbard broilers reduced average daily feed intake and had a considerably lower feed-to-weight ratio than the control group [4]. Broiler chickens of 8 and 14 days of age, when subjected to compensation of energy restriction, showed similar levels of average daily gain(ADG), average daily feed intake(ADFI), and feed/gain(F/G) to that with the control group [5]. It is suggested that animals undergoing restriction can negate possible adverse effects on growth performance by providing nutrition

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call