Abstract

The objective of this experiment was to study the effects of interactions between medium quality grass silage (GS1) and maize silage (MS) as well as between low-quality grass silage (GS2) and MS on ad libitum intake, digestibility and N retention in wether sheep. Two grass silages (GS1 and GS2) were ensiled in round bales, without additives, from the primary growth of orchard grass ( Dactylis glomerata L.) harvested at two different maturity stages. The study consisted of seven feeding treatments incorporating GS1, GS2 and MS fed alone and forage mixtures of GS1 and MS as well as GS2 and MS (67:33% and 33:67%, respectively, DM (dry matter) basis). Delayed harvesting lowered ( P < 0.05) the crude protein (CP) concentration in GS2 compared to GS1. The DM content (g kg − 1 fresh sample) and starch concentration (g kg − 1 DM) of MS were 264 and 211, respectively. Inclusion of MS in the GS1-based ration had positive linear effects on CP and starch digestibility ( P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively) and N intake ( P < 0.01) while a negative effect on neutral detergent fibre (NDF) and acid detergent fibre (ADF) digestibility ( P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). A positive associative response of GS1 and MS was observed for DM ad libitum intake (g kg − 1 M 0.75 day − 1 ) (quadratic, P < 0.05), CP digestibility (quadratic, P < 0.01), N intake (quadratic, P < 0.01) and N balance (quadratic, P < 0.05). Inclusion of MS into the GS2-based ration had a positive linear effect on the ration fresh matter ad libitum intake (kg day − 1 and g kg − 1 M 0.75 day − 1 ) ( P < 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively), NDF ad libitum intake (kg day − 1 and g kg − 1 M 0.75 day − 1 ) ( P < 0.01), digestibility of DM ( P < 0.01), organic matter (OM) ( P < 0.01), ADF ( P < 0.05), starch ( P < 0.001), digestibility of OM in DM ( D-value) ( P < 0.001), and N intake ( P < 0.01). Positive associative effects of GS2 and MS were observed on all the intake and digestibility parameters measured, N intake (quadratic, P < 0.001) and N balance (quadratic, P < 0.05). It was concluded that, as expected, a positive associative response of GS2 and MS was recorded for all the measured parameters while that of GS1 and MS for a limited number of parameters, probably due to lower quality of MS (lower starch concentration) than required for improved utilization of the GS1-based ration.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call