Effects of reducing and postponing controlled-release urea application on soil nitrogen regulation and maize grain yield

Pengtao Ji,Yujuan Peng,Yongwei Cui,Peijun Tao,Xiangling Li,Yuechen Zhang

doi:10.25165/j.ijabe.20221501.6888

Abstract

Controlled-release urea (CRU-N) fertilizer application is a solution to improve the utilization rate of nitrogen (N), reduce economic costs and improve crop yields. It is significant to study the effects of release CRU-N reduction and the combined application of conventional urea on soil N control and the large-scale maize planting system. In this study, the effects of controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer reduction and postponement on soil nitrogen components, enzyme activities, and yields were investigated. Seven treatments were set up in this study, including no N fertilizer (CK), 100% conventional urea (U), 100% controlled-release urea (S), 30% controlled-release urea (SU3/7), 50% controlled-release urea (SU5/5), 70% controlled-release urea (SU7/3) and Sodium Salt of Polyaspartic Acid (PASP)-N. The results showed that mixed CRU-N and urea increased yields and net benefits compared with conventional urea at the same application rate of N, and reduced N loss. The application of CRU-N at 70% for maize represented the best overall effects. Compared with U treatment, soil ammonium nitrogen (NH4-N), soil nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N), and microbial biomass nitrogen (SMB-N) of CRU-N at 70% (SU7/3) increased by 35.00%, 15.53%, and 25.04%. However, soil nitrate reductase (S-NR) and urease (S-UA) were the best in SU5/5 and significantly higher than other treatments. The applications of CRU-N would effectively increase soil N; CRU-N in 50% proportion can promote the maize root growth and improve the efficient utilization of N by soil microorganisms. Like the yields (9186.61 kg/hm2), expertly in the proportion of 70% CRU-N (SU7/3) plays a vital role in a wheat-maize rotation system, which can potentially be used to improve the yields, nitrogen use efficiency, and net benefit with low N losses. In conclusion, using CRU-N fertilize effectively improves soil nitrogen, and various ratios of CRU-N can ensure the continuous release the nutrients during the growing period. And among the different proportions of CRU-N, it is optimal in SU7/3. Keywords: controlled-release urea, nitrogen regulation, maize grain yield, soil, reducing, postponing DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20221501.6888 Citation: Ji P T, Peng Y J, Cui Y W, Li X L, Tao P J, Zhang Y C. Effects of reducing and postponing controlled-release urea application on soil nitrogen regulation and maize grain yield. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2022; 15(1): 116–123.

Highlights

Nitrogen is a limiting element for maize growth as well as a crucial factor closely related to maize yield[1]
The results showed that mixed CRU-N and urea increased yields and net benefits compared with conventional urea at the same application rate of N, and reduced N loss
The coefficient of variation (CV) classification of soil nitrogen patterns was used to indicate the extent of their variability

Summary

Introduction

Nitrogen is a limiting element for maize growth as well as a crucial factor closely related to maize yield[1]. With rising crop yields, using highly efficient fertilizers has become one of the key measures to reduce environmental pollution caused by excessive fertilization[4]. In China, controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer (CRU-N) has become the major trend in fertilizer application because of its excellent slow-release performance[8]. The benefits of controlled-release urea (CRU-N) are designed to release N based on N requirements for maize to cut down on nitrogen and reduce undesirable environmental pollution without decreasing crop yields[11,12]. Slowing down the release of nutrients and improving the nitrogen use efficiency, CRU-N makes the nutrient release be in synch with the nutrient requirements for maize as much as possible[13]. It was reported that CRU-N could effectively reduce nitrogen loss, improve nitrogen use efficiency and maintain nitrogen balance throughout the growing process of maize[14]

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusion