Abstract

A total of 102 English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners participated in the present study, which aimed to test how different types of corrective feedback-recasts and clarification requests-can differentially affect the suprasegment development of English intonation. All participants received 5 treatment sessions designed to encourage them to notice and practice the target feature in meaningful discourse; recasts or clarification requests were provided to the participants’ untargetlike production, except those in the control group (n=34), who received comparable instruction but without corrective feedback. Acoustic analyses were conducted on 7 intonation features including words/IP, pause, anacrusis, lengthing, pitch reset, improper tonicity and tone selection elicited via pretest and posttest measures targeting trained instances and untrained instances. The results showed that 1) recasts are more effective than clarification requests on EFL learners’ suprasegment development of English intonation; 2) recasts may not only lead learners to establish, reinforce and generalize their new phonological knowledge of English intonation that they had practiced during the treatments, but also help them transmit their attention from trained to untrained learning of foreign language input at a suprasegmental level.

Highlights

  • Over the past 25 years, the questions about the role of corrective feedback (CF) in Second Language Acquisition (SLA) have been extensively examined (Lyster et al 2013:1)

  • A total of 102 English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners participated in the present study, which aimed to test how different types of corrective feedback-recasts and clarification requests-can differentially affect the suprasegment development of English intonation

  • The results showed that 1) recasts are more effective than clarification requests on EFL learners’ suprasegment development of English intonation; 2) recasts may lead learners to establish, reinforce and generalize their new phonological knowledge of English intonation that they had practiced during the treatments, and help them transmit their attention from trained to untrained learning of foreign language input at a suprasegmental level

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Over the past 25 years, the questions about the role of corrective feedback (CF) in Second Language Acquisition (SLA) have been extensively examined (Lyster et al 2013:1). Previous studies have examined the impact of one single type of CF-recasts in response to nontarget pronunciation (Saito & Lyster, 2012a:595, b:387; Saito, 2013a:499, b:377; Saito & Wu, 2014:647, Saito & Saito, 2017:589; Lee & Lyster, 2016a:35; Parlark & Zigler, 2017:257). Given the relative scarcity of studies teasing apart the effectiveness of various components of CF for helping L2 learners’ pronunciation ability (Gooch et al, 2016:117; Lee & Lyster, 2016b:1), the present study aimed to examine the role of CF in L2 pronunciation development and to disentangle composite functions of CF effectiveness, namely recasts and clarification requests for English yes-no questions intonation

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call