Effects of Race and Insurance on Outcomes of the Open Abdomen

Abstract

Recent studies have suggested improved outcomes in surgical patients with healthcare insurance, whereas several others have noted disparities in access to health care, the care provided, and the aftercare of uninsured patients. Several different strategies exist in the management and prevention of the open abdomen secondary to abdominal compartment syndrome. To date, no study has evaluated the effects of race and insurance in patients with an open abdomen (OA). A retrospective review from our OA database was queried. All patients with an OA from January 2002 to December 2010 were included for analysis. Data analyzed included patients' demographics, race, insurance status, hospital charges, Injury Severity Scores, and outcomes. Insured patients were identified and compared with their uninsured counterparts. A total of 720 patients were treated for an OA during the study period. Of these, 273 (37.9%) died within their hospital stay. Patients who died were noted to be older and sicker with higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and Simplified Acute Physiologic Scores (27.6 vs. 18.2, P < 0.001 and 54.6 vs. 38.5, P < 0.001, respectively). Logistic regression analysis revealed that age, APACHE II, and Injury Severity Scores were independently associated with mortality. From our categorical variables, race was not associated with worse outcomes. In addition, being uninsured was significantly associated with increased mortality (odds ratio, 1.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.6; P = 0.05). "Self-pay" status was associated with increased mortality even after adjusting for severity of illness. Further studies incorporating baseline comorbidities need to be undertaken to further assess the reasons for these disparities.