Abstract
The Government of Ontario, Canada, announced hospital funding reforms in 2011, including Quality-based Procedures (QBPs) involving pre-set funds for managing patients with specific diagnoses/procedures. A key goal was to improve quality of care across the jurisdiction. Interrupted time series evaluated the policy change, focusing on four QBPs (congestive heart failure, hip fracture surgery, pneumonia, prostate cancer surgery), on patients hospitalized 2010-2017. Outcomes included return to hospital or death within 30 days, acute length of stay (LOS), volume of admissions, and patient characteristics. At 2 years post-QBPs, the percentage of hip fracture patients who returned to hospital or died was 3.13% higher in absolute terms (95% CI: 0.37% to 5.89%) than if QBPs had not been introduced. There were no other statistically significant changes for return to hospital or death. For LOS, the only statistically significant change was an increase for prostate cancer surgery of 0.33 days (95% CI: 0.07 to 0.59). Volume increased for congestive heart failure admissions by 80 patients (95% CI: 2 to 159) and decreased for hip fracture surgery by 138 patients (95% CI: -183 to -93) but did not change for pneumonia or prostate cancer surgery. The percentage of patients who lived in the lowest neighborhood income quintile increased slightly for those diagnosed with congestive heart failure (1.89%; 95% CI: 0.51% to 3.27%) and decreased for those who underwent prostate cancer surgery (-2.08%; 95% CI: -3.74% to -0.43%). This policy initiative involving a change to hospital funding for certain conditions was not associated with substantial, jurisdictional-level changes in access or quality.
Highlights
Policymakers worldwide are experimenting with hospital funding models to improve system performance [1,2,3]
At 2 years post-Quality-Based Procedures (QBPs), the percentage of hip fracture patients who returned to hospital or died was 3.13% higher in absolute terms than if QBPs had not been introduced
For length of stay (LOS), the only statistically significant change was an increase for prostate cancer surgery of 0.33 days
Summary
Policymakers worldwide are experimenting with hospital funding models to improve system performance [1,2,3]. In April 2011, the Government of Ontario, Canada, announced a multi-year phased-in implementation of “patient-based” hospital funding [7]. These hospital funding reforms reduced reliance on global hospital budgets (i.e., fixed annual amount based largely on historical spending) by introducing two new components to hospital funding: Health Based Allocation Model (HBAM), organizational-level funding based on service and patient characteristics; and Quality-Based Procedures (QBPs), a novel approach to hospital funding sharing some characteristics with activity-based funding (ABF) [8]. The Government of Ontario, Canada, announced hospital funding reforms in 2011, including Quality-based Procedures (QBPs) involving pre-set funds for managing patients with specific diagnoses/procedures. A key goal was to improve quality of care across the jurisdiction
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
