Abstract

SUMMARYSeveral lines of circumstantial evidence collectively indicated that poor early growth of apple (‘replant disease’) might be associated with the effects of soil‐borne pythiaceous fungi. This hypothesis was supported by pathogenicity tests. All isolates tested of P. sylvaticum and certain isolates of seven other Pythium spp. significantly reduced the growth of apple seedlings. The growth reductions caused by certain Pythium isolates were of comparable magnitude to the growth increases occurring after chloropicrin‐fumigation of apple orchard soils. The Pythium isolates most virulent to apple were of low virulence to a clonal cherry rootstock.Reappraisal of the nature of the disease as a non‐specific soil malaise is consistent with established features of the pathology of Pythium spp. The disease, however, is an ill‐defined ‘poor growth phenomenon’ with no diagnostic symptoms and conclusive evidence that Pythium spp. are widely causal is likely to be elusive.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.