Abstract

This study investigated the effect of providing extra water and nesting material to Moo Lath sows on piglet survival and growth. Three treatments were evaluated in a randomized block design with six sows/treatment. In the Control treatment, sows were not provided with nesting material or extra water apart from that included in the feed (conventional smallholder practice). In treatment NM, nesting material was provided 1–2 days before expected farrowing. In treatment NMW, nesting material as in NM and extra water were provided ad libitum throughout the study. Data on sow feed and water intake, plasma protein concentration (TPP), body weight, and re-mating period, and on litter size, body weight, and survival of piglets, were collected for two reproduction cycles. NMW sows had higher water intake than Control and NM sows (14.7, 4.5, and 4.5 L/day, respectively, SE = 0.2). The weight loss from 2 weeks prior to farrowing until weaning was smaller in NMW than in NM and Control sows (16.0, 23.8, and 22.9 kg, respectively, SE = 0.9). TPP dropped from farrowing until 21 days of lactation in NMW sows, whereas it increased or was unchanged in NM and Control sows. The re-mating period was shorter and the number of litters/year was higher in NMW than in Control and NM sows (2.2, 2.0, and 2.0, respectively, SE = 0.01). Piglet mortality was lower in NMW than in Control and NM (9.5, 43.9, and 26.7%, respectively, SE = 4.9). Piglets in NMW were heavier at weaning and had higher daily weight gain than Control and NM piglets. It was concluded that providing water ad libitum and nesting material improved piglet survival and growth, and that providing water ad libitum improved sow physiological and reproductive fitness. However, provision of nesting material without access to ad libitum water might increase susceptibility to heat stress in sows.

Highlights

  • Pig production in Lao PDR is primarily based on smallholder production systems, which supply about 85% of the total production (Lao Statistics Bureau 2013)

  • There was no difference in feed intake between the treatments, but sows provided with extra water and nesting material (NMW treatment) had significantly higher (P < 0.001) water intake than sows in the Control and NM treatments (Table 3)

  • This study clearly demonstrates the benefits of ad libitum access to water in sows

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pig production in Lao PDR is primarily based on smallholder production systems, which supply about 85% of the total production (Lao Statistics Bureau 2013). Smallholder pig farms are predominantly extensive, low-input systems found mostly in rural regions (Phengsavanh et al 2011). These systems use native breeds and take advantage of by-products and naturally occurring feed. Scavenging around the village, forests, and fallow fields is common (Phengsavanh and Stür 2006; Chittavong et al 2012a), but some farmers keep animals in enclosures or pens (Chittavong et al 2012a), especially during the cropping season (Phengsavanh et al 2011).

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call