Abstract

ABSTRACT Two studies evaluated replacing traditional growing diets with pelleted feed. In Exp. 1, 6 steers were used in a 4 × 6 Youden square evaluating pelleting and harvest method of corn stover on total-tract digestion. Treatments included 2 control diets containing 18% modified distillers grains plus solubles, 18% solubles, and either 60% untreated (NEGCON) or alkaline treated (POSCON) corn stover. Remaining treatments were 1 of 2 pelleted diets containing alkaline treated corn stover, dry distillers grains, solubles, and supplement. Corn stover was harvested by raking and baling (CONV) or a baler pulled behind the combine (MOG). In Exp. 2, a 92-d study used 360 (initial BW = 316 kg) steers to evaluate replacing the NEGCON with CONV pellets on performance. Pellets were either pair fed (PELPF) to NEGCON or fed ad libitum (PELAL). In Exp. 1, MOG had the greatest OM and NDF digestion (75.55 and 63.93%, respectively), whereas NEGCON had the least (67.58 and 54.36%, respectively; P P > 0.50) between NEGCON and PELPF treatments in ending BW, DMI, or ADG (1.29 and 1.27 kg/d, respectively). The PELAL treatment had the greatest ( P P = 0.05) compared with CON and PELPF treatments (G:F = 0.143 and 0.140, respectively). Replacing a traditional growing diet with a complete pelleted feed resulted in comparable or improved digestibility but decreased G:F when cattle were fed ad libitum.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.