Abstract
Abstract In multi‐choice feeding experiments in which freshly prepared loose grain bait (FB) in a mixture of wheat, sugar and peanut oil (WSP, 96:2:2) containing 0.005% of an anticoagulant rodenticide Flocoumafen and its ready‐to‐use wax cake formulation (RUC) were offered in choice with plain bait in an experimental pen, the lesser bandicoot rat, Bandicota bengalensis after initial sampling, rejected and displaced the RUC, whereas the Indian gerbil, Tatera indica nibbled it into small pieces at its original location. Previous feeding experience of rats on WSP or plain millet and the availability of these foods as alternatives to toxic baits during their treatment had no effect on the preference of B. bengalensis for FB over RUC, which happened in the case of T. indica. Mean daily consumption (g/100g body weight) of FB by B. bengalensis and T. indica was 2.31 ± 0.33 and 1.75 ± 0.29 respectively and the corresponding values for RUC were 0.23±0.08 and 1.12 + 0.13 in the experiment in which the previous and alternative food (WSP) was the same as the base material for FB. When plain WSP was changed to millet, the mean daily consumption of FB by B. bengalensis and T. indica was 1.65 ± 0.35 and 1.83±0.24g/100g body weight respectively and the corresponding values of RUC were 0.10±0.07 and 1.86±0.62g/100g body weight. Species‐specific differences in the behavioural responses toward Flocoumafen baits suggested that RUC is unsuitable for the control of B. bengalensis and has limited potential against T. indica whereas FB is more effective against both species.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.