Abstract

Summary Time-lapse seismic analysis has been successfully applied to monitor fluid saturation changes during production. Even though the seismic difference is observable in preferred environments, it might be produced not by changes in fluid saturation but by changes in other reservoir properties such as temperature or pore pressure. This might misdirect the interpretation of time-lapse seismic data. AVO attributes can also be useful tools to distinguish causes of some of these changes in reservoir properties. In this paper we investigate this problem by simulating timelapse AVO attributes in two different reservoir models. Our model examples show that amplitude changes for far offset data in a light oil saturated reservoir subjected to water injection are twice as large as analogous changes in zero offset data. The gas saturated reservoir also shows a large amplitude change in the far offset data, but it is relatively small compared to the oil saturated model. This is because the Vp/Vs ratio increases in the oil reservoir but changes by only a slight amount in the gas reservoir. The simulated time-lapse AVO is less sensitive to the pressure change than to changes in fluid type.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.