Abstract

Whether supplemental dietary β-carotene affects periparturient cows and vitamins A and E in cows when dietary vitamin A is adequate remains uncertain. Our objective was to assess the effect of β-carotene supplementation during the close-up dry period in a herd with adequate status of vitamins A and E but low in β-carotene. The study was conducted on a large commercial dairy farm in Indiana during early summer of 2015. Ninety-four multiparous Holstein cows were assigned to either control (CON; n = 47) or β-carotene (BC; n = 47) treatments. When locked in headgates each morning, each cow received a topdress of β-carotene (Rovimix, 8 g/d; provided 800 mg of β-carotene) or carrier from 21 d before expected calving until calving. Blood samples were collected at 21 ± 1 d (mean ± standard deviation) before expected calving (before treatments began), 7 ± 1 d before calving, immediately following parturition, and 7 ± 1 d postpartum. Blood serum was analyzed for vitamins A and E, β-carotene, cholesterol, and other metabolites and enzymes. Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure in SAS (SAS Institute Inc.). Cows had low β-carotene concentrations (0.85 μg/mL) in blood serum before treatments began. Compared with CON cows, BC cows had higher overall mean concentrations of β-carotene (2.87 μg/mL vs. 0.73 μg/mL) and retinol (165 vs. 143 ng/mL). Cows fed BC had lower α-tocopherol in serum than cows fed CON (2.26 vs. 2.46 µg/mL). Cows fed BC had lower peak milk than cows fed CON (50.9 vs. 55.3), but total lactation milk yield did not differ significantly. No effects of BC were observed on days to conception (100 d) or times bred (2.4). Treatments did not affect incidences of ketosis, retained placenta, displaced abomasum, off feed, lameness, footrot, mastitis, or metritis. In conclusion, in pregnant cows already receiving adequate vitamin A but with low serum β-carotene concentration, supplementation of β-carotene increased concentrations of β-carotene and vitamin A in blood serum, but did not affect production, reproduction, or health.

Highlights

  • The transition period is a critical time for dairy cows (Drackley, 1999; Horst et al, 2021)

  • Oxidative species are necessary to help defend against invading pathogens and dispose of potentially harmful compounds in the body, an excess of reactive oxidative species (ROS) can cause oxidative stress to the animal, leading to possible tissue damage and impaired function (Lykkesfeldt and Svendsen, 2007)

  • Results for the vitamins found in the tested ingredients and TMR are reported

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The transition period is a critical time for dairy cows (Drackley, 1999; Horst et al, 2021). Immunological activation during the prepartum period (Horst et al, 2021) may lead to increased production of reactive oxidative species (ROS), which, if in excess of antioxidant capabilities, can damage cellular structures (Machlin and Bendich, 1987; Albera and Kankofer, 2009). Around the time of parturition, metabolic activity in both cow and fetal calf increases, causing a surge of ROS and oxidative stress (Castillo et al, 2005; Albera and Kankofer, 2010). Metabolic, or immunological stressors can further increase the amount of ROS and potentially overwhelm the antioxidant system. This vicious cycle can either be chased by managing the outcomes or be addressed more directly by way of antioxidants

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call