Abstract
People with transtibial amputation (TTA) using passive-elastic prostheses have greater leg muscle activity and metabolic cost during level-ground and sloped walking than non-amputees. Use of a stance-phase powered (BiOM) versus passive-elastic prosthesis reduces metabolic cost for people with TTA during level-ground, +3° and +6° walking. Metabolic cost is associated with muscle activity, which may provide insight into differences between prostheses. We measured affected leg (AL) and unaffected leg (UL) muscle activity from ten people with TTA (6 males, 4 females) walking at 1.25 m s-1 on a dual-belt force-measuring treadmill at 0°, ±3°, ±6° and ±9° using their own passive-elastic and the BiOM prosthesis. We compared stride average integrated EMG (iEMG), peak EMG and muscle activity burst duration. Use of the BiOM increased UL lateral gastrocnemius iEMG on downhill slopes and AL biceps femoris on +6° and +9° slopes, and decreased UL rectus femoris on uphill slopes, UL vastus lateralis on +6° and +9°, and soleus and tibialis anterior on a +9° slope compared to a passive-elastic prosthesis. Differences in leg muscle activity for people with TTA using a passive-elastic versus stance-phase powered prosthesis do not clearly explain differences in metabolic cost during walking on level ground and slopes.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
