Abstract
Electrostatic powder deposition using corona charging is widely used in a plethora of industrial applications. Disadvantages of this technique are back corona onset and the Faraday penetration limitation. Another method to charge powders is to use tribochargers. Tribocharging depends upon the work function difference between the contacting materials and generates bipolarly charged particles. In this study, acrylic and epoxy powders were fluidized and charged by passing through stainless steel, copper, aluminum, and polycarbonate static mixers, respectively. The particle velocity and powder flow rate were varied to determine their effect on the net charge-to-mass ratio (Q/M) acquired by the powders. The Q/M increased rapidly with velocities between 1.5 to 2.5 m/s and stabilized for higher velocities but decreased with increasing powder flow rate at a constant velocity. The net positive or negative charge on each powder was determined to be dependant on the charger material. The use of an aluminum charger (net negative charge) in combination with a PTFE finger nozzle (net positive charge) resulted in a net powder Q/M of − 0.05 μC/g. The generation of an ion-free powder cloud with high bipolar charge but overall charge density of almost zero is anticipated to provide a better coverage of recessed areas.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.