Abstract
Background: The pathophysiological effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on respiratory mechanics, lung recruitment, and intracranial pressure (ICP) in acute brain-injured patients have not been completely elucidated. The primary aim of this study was to assess the effects of PEEP augmentation on respiratory mechanics, quantitative computed lung tomography (qCT) findings, and its relationship with ICP modifications. Secondary aims included the assessment of the correlations between different factors (respiratory mechanics and qCT features) with the changes of ICP and how these factors at baseline may predict ICP response after greater PEEP levels.Methods: A prospective, observational study included mechanically ventilated patients with acute brain injury requiring invasive ICP and who underwent two-PEEP levels lung CT scan. Respiratory system compliance (Crs), arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), mean arterial pressure (MAP), data from qCT and ICP were obtained at PEEP 5 and 15 cmH2O.Results: Sixteen examinations (double PEEP lung CT and neuromonitoring) in 15 patients were analyzed. The median age of the patients was 54 years (interquartile range, IQR = 39–65) and 53% were men. The median Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) at intensive care unit (ICU) admission was 8 (IQR = 3–12). Median alveolar recruitment was 2.5% of total lung weight (−1.5 to 4.7). PEEP from 5 to 15 cmH2O increased ICP [median values from 14.0 (11.2–17.5) to 23.5 (19.5–26.8) mmHg, p < 0.001, respectively]. The amount of recruited lung tissue on CT was inversely correlated with the change (Δ) in ICP (rho = −0.78; p = 0.0006). Additionally, ΔCrs (rho = −0.77, p = 0.008), ΔPaCO2 (rho = 0.81, p = 0.0003), and ΔMAP (rho = −0.64, p = 0.009) were correlated with ΔICP. Baseline Crs was not predictive of ICP response to PEEP.Conclusions: The main factors associated with increased ICP after PEEP augmentation included reduced Crs, lower MAP and lung recruitment, and increased PaCO2, but none of these factors was able to predict, at baseline, ICP response to PEEP. To assess the potential benefits of increased PEEP in patients with acute brain injury, hemodynamic status, respiratory mechanics, and lung morphology should be taken into account.
Highlights
A substantial number of patients with acute brain injury require mechanical ventilation (Borsellino et al, 2016) due to both neurological and respiratory causes (Della Torre et al, 2017)
Strategies comprising the use of high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) have been challenged in braininjured patients because of concerns regarding their effects on cerebral hemodynamics (Nemer et al, 2011; Borsellino et al, 2016; Robba et al, 2020), in particular intracranial pressure (ICP)
In a population of mechanically ventilated patients with acute brain injury, we found that (1) PEEP augmentation from 5 to 15 cmH2O may lead to higher oxygenation, PaCO2, and ICP values, with alveolar recruitment of 2.5% of total lung weight; (2) ICP increase with PEEP was correlated to higher PaCO2, poor alveolar recruitment, reduction of Crs, and decreased MAP; (3) baseline values of Crs, PaCO2, MAP, and ICP are not predictive for ICP increase with PEEP; and (4) changes in ONSD, but not ICP estimation using transcranial Doppler (TCD) (ICPTCD), are correlated to changes in ICP
Summary
A substantial number of patients with acute brain injury require mechanical ventilation (Borsellino et al, 2016) due to both neurological and respiratory causes (Della Torre et al, 2017). The pathophysiological interplay between intracranial changes, respiratory system mechanics, and alveolar recruitment has not been completely elucidated, and no specific recommendations are available regarding the optimal levels of PEEP to be applied in acute brain-injured patients (Robba et al, 2020). We conducted an observational study whose primary aim was to investigate the effects of two levels of PEEP (5 and 15 cmH2O) on respiratory mechanics, quantitative lung computed tomography (qCT) findings, and its relationship with ICP changes in braininjured patients. The pathophysiological effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on respiratory mechanics, lung recruitment, and intracranial pressure (ICP) in acute brain-injured patients have not been completely elucidated. The primary aim of this study was to assess the effects of PEEP augmentation on respiratory mechanics, quantitative computed lung tomography (qCT) findings, and its relationship with ICP modifications. Secondary aims included the assessment of the correlations between different factors (respiratory mechanics and qCT features) with the changes of ICP and how these factors at baseline may predict ICP response after greater PEEP levels
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
