Abstract

ObjectiveThe present study investigated the effects of the stimulus polarity and location of motor evoked potential (MEP) to establish a stimulation protocol. MethodsNineteen patients who intraoperatively underwent MEP in bipolar direct cortical stimulation were enrolled in the present study. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) of the contralateral median nerve stimulation were recorded to determine stimulation sites. MEP was performed under two settings in all patients: 1. Anodal bipolar stimulation: an anode on the precentral gyrus and a cathode on the postcentral gyrus, 2. Cathodal bipolar stimulation: a cathode on the precentral gyrus and an anode on the postcentral gyrus. MEP amplitudes and the coefficient of variation (CV) at a stimulation intensity of 25 mA and the thresholds of induced MEP were compared between the two settings. ResultsAn electrical stimulation at 25 mA induced a significantly higher amplitude in cathodal bipolar stimulation than in anodal bipolar stimulation. Cathodal bipolar stimulation also showed significantly lower thresholds than anodal stimulation. CV did not significantly differ between the two groups. ConclusionsThese results indicate that cathodal bipolar stimulation is superior to anodal bipolar stimulation for intraoperative MEP monitoring. SignificanceMEP in cathodal bipolar cortical stimulation may be used in a safe and useful evaluation method of motor fiber damage that combines sensitivity and specificity.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call