Effects of photobiomodulation with blue Light Emitting Diode (LED) on the healing of skin burns.

Abstract

The management of skin burns is still challenging. Among the therapeutic methods used, there are topical treatments with pharmacological and herbal agents, low-intensity therapeutic ultrasound, use of biomaterials, reconstructive techniques and photobiomodulation therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of photobiomodulation with blue Light Emitting Diode (LED) on burn healing. Fifty Wistar rats were divided into control (CTRL) (n = 25) and blue LED (LED) (n = 25), with subgroups (n = 5) for each time of euthanasia (7, 14, 21, 28 and 32days). Treated animals were daily irradiated (470nm, 1W, 0.44 W/cm2, 50J/cm2). Clinical evaluations were performed and the Wound Retraction Index (WRI) was determined. Histological sections were submitted to hematoxylin-eosin, toluidine blue and the immunohistochemical technique, with anti-α-SMA and anti-TGF-β1 antibodies. All data were directly collected by previously calibrated evaluators in a blind manner. The values were included in a statistical program. For all statistical tests used, 5% significance level (p < 0.05) was considered. No statistically significant differences in WRI between groups were observed (p > 0.05). Re-epithelialization was higher using LED at 7 and 14days (p < 0.05) and greater amount of inflammatory cells was observed at 7days (p = 0.01). With LED at 21 and 32days, greater number of mast cells were observed (p < 0.05), as well as smaller number of myofibroblasts at 14, 21, 28 and 32days (p < 0.05) and lower percentage of TGF-β1 positive cells in the conjunctiva at 7, 14 and 21days (p < 0.05). Negative correlations were observed in LED between the percentage of TGF-β1 in the epithelium and the mean number of inflammatory cells and number of myofibroblasts (p < 0.05). The results suggest that, depending on the period, blue LED can modulate the healing processes of third-degree skin burns, such as re-epithelialization, inflammatory response, mast cell concentration, myofibroblast differentiation and TGF-β1 immunoexpression. Despite these effects, this therapy does not seem to have significant influence on the retraction of these wounds. Future studies, using different protocols, should be carried out to expand the knowledge about the photobiomodulatory mechanisms of this type of light in the healing process.