Abstract
Study Objective To evaluate if the addition of pharmacologic prophylaxis (heparin, low molecular weight heparin) for VTE is associated with adverse perioperative outcomes in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) hysterectomy for benign indications compared to mechanical prophylaxis alone. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative (MSQC). Patients or Participants Patients who underwent a benign MIS hysterectomy (i.e. laparoscopic, vaginal, laparoscopic-assisted vaginal, or robotic-assisted laparoscopy) performed between July 2012 and June 2015 and received mechanical prophylaxis for thromboembolism. Interventions Patients were divided into cohorts who received mechanical prophylaxis alone (MPpx) or mechanical + pharmacologic prophylaxis (M+Pppx). Propensity score matching was used to minimize confounding due to differences in age, race, body mass index>40, hypertension, congestive heart failure, smoking, functional status, preoperative transfusion, preoperative anemia or thrombocytopenia, length of stay, and hospital teaching status. Outcomes evaluated in the propensity-matched cohorts were estimated blood loss, intraoperative time, postoperative blood transfusion, postoperative VTE, surgical site infection, reoperation, and readmission. Measurements and Main Results There were 1944 matched pairs of patients in the Mppx and M+Pppx cohorts. Intraoperative time was 21 minutes longer (168 minutes ± 63 min vs 189 ± 75 mins, p Conclusion Further research is needed into the addition of pharmacologicprophylaxis to mechanical prophylaxis and its association with longer operative time for benign minimally invasive hysterectomy. Given extremely low rates of VTE in both groups and no difference detected in other significant peri-operative outcomes using a large database, it seems reasonable to question routine use of pharmacologic prophylaxis in these patients.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.