Effects of peripheral artery disease on long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with severe coronary artery disease

Abstract

BackgroundThere is a scarcity of data evaluating the effect of peripheral artery disease (PAD) on long-term mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) relative to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with severe coronary artery disease in real-world practice. MethodsAmong 14,867 consecutive patients who underwent their first coronary revascularization with PCI or isolated CABG between 2011 and 2013 in the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG registry Cohort-3, the current study population consisted of 3380 patients with three-vessel coronary artery disease or left main coronary artery disease. Long-term clinical outcomes were compared between PCI and CABG stratified by the presence or absence of PAD. Median clinical follow-up was 5.9 (IQR: 5.1–6.8) years. ResultsThere were 461 patients with PAD (PCI: N = 307, CABG: N = 154), and 2919 patients without PAD (PCI: N = 1823, CABG: N = 1096). The cumulative 5-year mortality after coronary revascularization was 31.2 % in patients with PAD and 16.2 % in those without PAD (p < 0.0001). There was a higher risk of PCI relative to CABG for all-cause death in patients with and without PAD (adjusted HR, 1.59; 95%CI, 0.99–2.53; p = 0.054, and HR, 1.25; 95%CI, 1.01–1.56; p = 0.04) without interaction (p interaction p = 0.48); Nevertheless, there was no excess risk of PCI relative to CABG for cardiovascular death regardless of PAD. ConclusionsThe long-term mortality after coronary revascularization was significantly higher in severe CAD patients with PAD than those without PAD. There was a higher mortality risk of PCI relative to CABG in patients with and without PAD without interaction, which was mainly driven by excess non-cardiovascular deaths.