Effects of percutaneous coronary intervention on improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction among chronic coronary syndrome patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction

Abstract

Abstract Background At present, the therapeutic effects in response to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) remain unclear. Methods Based on the Cardiorenal ImprovemeNt (CIN) cohort study (NCT04407936), we analyzed data of 468 hemodynamically-stable CCS patients with LVSD accepting guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) from January 2007 to December 2018. The primary outcome was the improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and long-term cardiac death. The association between PCI treatment combined with GDMT (PCI-GDMT) and LVEF improvement was evaluated by using propensity score matching (PSM) and logistics regression analysis. Results Of the 468 patients included in the study, 135 (28.8%) with GDMT alone and 333 (71.2%) cases were treated with PCI-GDMT. Patients undergoing PCI showed remarkably more vessel lesions but have better cardiac function. After fully adjusting for confounders, the LVEF among CCS patients with LVSD accepting PCI-GDMT were less likely to improve compared with GDMT alone [after PSM: risk adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.48, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.25-0.88, P = 0.02]. Also, PCI therapy may did not bring significant long-term outcome benefit [all-cause death: risk adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.00, 95% CI:0.62-1.62, P = 0.99; cardiac death: aHR 0.61, 95% CI:0.31-1.24, P = 0.17]. Conclusions Our cohort suggested that PCI treatment may not favor to the improvement of LVEF and not show significant differences in long-term outcome among hemodynamically-stable CCS patients with LVSD.Central Illustration