Effects of Pelvic Floor Muscle Physiotherapy on Urinary, Bowel, and Sexual Functions in Women with Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Endometriosis is a chronic and recurrent disease defined as the presence and proliferation of endometrial glands and stroma outside the uterine cavity. It affects up to 6-10% of women of reproductive age and can be classified into superficial, ovarian, and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). Deep infiltrating endometriosis can be associated with pain symptoms and pelvic floor muscle hypertone. Moreover, it may be responsible of bowel, urinary, and sexual dysfunctions with impairment of women's quality of life. Few studies have investigated the role of physiotherapy in women with DIE. Here, we aimed first to evaluate the effects of pelvic floor physiotherapy (PFP) on urinary, bowel, and sexual functions. Secondly, we aimed to evaluate the effects of ultrasound visual feedback during PFP on pelvic floor and subjective modifications in the frequency of sexual intercourse. Materials and Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted between June 2018 and December 2019 at our tertiary center. Nulliparous women with DIE and superficial dyspareunia were enrolled. At first examination, levator hiatal area (LHA) assessed with 3D/4D transperineal ultrasound, pain symptoms, urinary, bowel, and sexual functions were evaluated. Then, women were randomly assigned to no intervention (control group) or treatment with five individual sessions of PFP (experimental group), and after four months women underwent a second examination. Urinary, bowel, and sexual functions were assessed with validated questionnaires at first and second examinations. In particular, the Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms questionnaire was used to evaluate urinary symptoms, the Knowles-Eccersley-Scott-Symptom questionnaire to assess the presence of constipation, and the Female Sexual Function Index to investigate sexual function. Study outcomes were the comparisons among groups in terms of differences in actual changes in median of questionnaire scores between first and second examinations. Results: Thirty women (17 in the experimental group and 13 in the control group) completed the study. No significant differences were found between the two groups regarding urinary, bowel, and sexual functions, although women in the experimental group showed a tendency towards an improvement in constipation symptoms. Conclusion: In women with DIE, PFP does not appear to affect urinary, bowel, and sexual functions. Therefore, despite the improvement in superficial dyspareunia, chronic pelvic pain, and PFM relaxation with high treatment satisfaction, women should be informed about the unclear impact of PFP on urinary, bowel, and sexual functions. Larger studies are necessary to further investigate the impact of PFP on these functions.