Effects of pea protein content and extrusion types on physicochemical properties and texture characteristic of meat analogs

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundWith the change in consumers' lifestyles, the global demand for meat analogs is growing rapidly. However, soy has many drawbacks as a raw material to produce meat analogs, such as its allergy potential (glycinin and β‐conglycinin) and some unpredictable alterations in genetic DNA, proteins, and biochemical processing due to genetic modification. This paper aims to study the physicochemical and textural properties of meat analogs obtained under different pea protein contents and extrusion types to explore the potential of applying pea protein to meat analogs.ResultsHigh‐moisture meat analog (HMMA) is superior to low‐moisture meat analog (LMMA) based on the physical properties (integrity index and nitrogen solubility index) and texture properties (texture profile analysis and cutting strength). The higher the amount of pea protein added, the higher the degree of sample texturization. At low‐moisture extrusion cooking (LMEC), higher isolated pea protein content is accompanied by lower water holding capacity and higher texturization. Hydrophobic interactions play a slightly greater role than disulfide bonds in stabilizing the protein structure of the extrudates. The type of extrusion significantly affected the free sulfhydryl and disulfide bond content of the extrudate, while the source of raw material has an important relationship with protein solubility and free sulfhydryl content. Dodecyl sulfated gel electrophoresis (SDS‐PAGE) showed that most of the protein subunits remained after extrusion.ConclusionsExtrusion types and isolated pea protein contents showed significant effects on the properties of meat analogs, and isolated pea protein has great potential for application in the production of meat analogs.