Abstract
The effects of halogenating the same synthetic vulcanized styrene–butadiene rubber (R2) (used as a sole material in the shoe industry) twice (double halogenation) using solutions of trichloroisocyanuric acid (TCI) in MEK were studied. The R2 rubber was treated with 0.5 and 2 wt% TCI/MEK solutions and after 1 h re-treated with additional 0.5 (0.5 + 0.5 wt% TCI/MEK) and 2 wt% TCI/MEK (2 + 2 wt% TCI/MEK) solutions. The results obtained were compared with those obtained by treating the R2 rubber once with 1 and 4 wt% TCI/MEK solutions. The surface modifications produced by the double halogenation of the R2 rubber were analyzed using advancing and receding contact angles (variations in wettability), XPS and ATR-IR spectroscopy (characterization of chemical modifications) and SEM (morphological modifications). T-peel tests on doubly halogenated R2 rubber/polyurethane adhesive joints were carried out to quantify the adhesion properties of the treated R2 rubber. The degree of chlorination was higher with increasing amount of chlorinating agent. Furthermore, the most efficient removal of hydrocarbon substances from the R2 rubber surface was obtained by double halogenation and by increasing the TCI concentration. Similar trends in surface chemistry of the R2 rubber were obtained using 0.5–2 wt% TCI/MEK, with or without double halogenation. On the other hand, by comparing the effects of treatments with 0.5 + 0.5 wt% TCI/MEK and 1 wt% TCI/MEK or with 2 + 2 wt% TCI/MEK and 4 wt% TCI/MEK, less effective removal of zinc stearate and less degree of chlorination were obtained by double halogenation although similar outermost surface modifications were produced. The second application of the TCI/MEK solution on the already halogenated R2 rubber dissolved the unreacted TCI and/or the isocyanuric acid crystals on its surface. The mechanical properties of the treated R2 rubber decreased because it became stiffer. Higher and relatively similar peel strength values were obtained in all adhesive joints prepared using treated R2 rubber. A cohesive failure in the rubber close to the chlorinated layer was always obtained.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
