Abstract

Although neurocircuits can be activated by focused ultrasound stimulation, it is unclear whether this is also true for spinal cord neurocircuits. In this study, we used low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) to stimulate lumbar 4–lumbar 5 (L4–L5) segments of the spinal cord of normal Sprague Dawley rats with a clapper. The activation of the spinal cord neurocircuits enhanced soleus muscle contraction as measured by electromyography (EMG). Neuronal activation and injury were assessed by EMG, western blotting (WB), immunofluorescence, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, Nissl staining, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), immunohistochemistry (IHC), somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), motor evoked potentials (MEPs), and the Basso–Beattie–Bresnahan locomotor rating scale. When the LIFU intensity was more than 0.5 MPa, LIFU stimulation induced soleus muscle contraction and increased the EMG amplitudes (P < 0.05) and the number of c-fos- and GAD65-positive cells (P < 0.05). When the LIFU intensity was 3.0 MPa, the LIFU stimulation led to spinal cord damage and decreased SEP amplitudes for electrophysiological assessment (P < 0.05); this resulted in coagulation necrosis, structural destruction, neuronal loss in the dorsal horn by H&E and Nissl staining, and increased expression of GFAP, IL-1β, TNF-α, and caspase-3 by IHC, ELISA, and WB (P < 0.05). These results show that LIFU can activate spinal cord neurocircuits and that LIFU stimulation with an irradiation intensity ≤1.5 MPa is a safe neurostimulation method for the spinal cord.

Highlights

  • Neurostimulation technology, including focused ultrasound stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), and optogenetic stimulation, has become an important neuromodulation method for various neurological conditions

  • When the low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) intensity was >0.5 MPa, the recruitment of Sol muscle was measured on EMG

  • When the stimulation intensity was >1.0 MPa, LIFU ON induced significant muscle recruitment and the EMG amplitude was significantly higher than that at LIFU OFF stimulation (P < 0.05). ere was no significant difference in the amplitude among LIFU OFF time point (P > 0.05) (Supplementary Figure 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Neurostimulation technology, including focused ultrasound stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), and optogenetic stimulation, has become an important neuromodulation method for various neurological conditions. DBS, including electrical stimulation or epidural electrical stimulation, is a commonly used neurostimulation method. Focused ultrasound has attracted much attention and interest due to its high spatial resolution, noninvasive neurostimulation, and effective stimulation of the deep tissues with submillimeter static resolution [7, 8]. It has become an alternative modality for neuromodulation [9]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.