Abstract

Torulaspora delbrueckii is becoming widely recommended for improving some specific characteristics of wines. However, its impact on wine quality is still far from satisfactory at the winery level, mostly because it is easily replaced by Saccharomyces cerevisiae-like yeasts during must fermentation. New T. delbrueckii killer strains were here isolated and selected for winemaking. They killed S. cerevisiae yeasts and were able to dominate and complete the fermentation of sterile grape must. Sequential yeast inoculation of non-sterile white must with T. delbrueckii followed by S. cerevisiae did not ensure T. delbrueckii dominance or wine quality improvement. Only a single initial must inoculation at high cell concentrations allowed the T. delbrueckii killer strains to dominate and complete the must fermentation to reach above 11% ethanol, but not the non-killer strains. None of the wines underwent malolactic fermentation as long as the must had low turbidity and pH. Although no statistically significant differences were found in the wine quality score, the S. cerevisiae-dominated wines were preferred over the T. delbrueckii-dominated ones because the former had high-intensity fresh fruit aromas while the latter had lower intensity, but nevertheless nice and unusual dried fruit/pastry aromas. Except for ethyl propanoate and 3-ethoxy-1-propanol, which were more abundant in the T. delbrueckii–dominated wines, most of the compounds with fresh fruit odor descriptors, including those with the greatest odor activity values (isoamyl acetate, ethyl hexanoate, and ethyl octanoate), were more abundant in the S. cerevisiae–dominated wines. The low relative concentrations of these fruity compounds made it possible to detect in the T. delbrueckii–dominated wines the low-relative-concentration compounds with dried fruit and pastry odors. An example was γ-ethoxy-butyrolactone which was significantly more abundant in these wines than in those dominated by S. cerevisiae.

Highlights

  • The non-Saccharomyces yeasts which are usually present in spontaneous must fermentations have been receiving ever more attention by the part of wine microbiologists because some of them can improve wine complexity

  • We addressed the following issues: (i) capacity of Kbarr strains to dominate and complete must fermentation in the presence of S. cerevisiae yeasts; (ii) influence of must treatment on this Kbarr-1 strain domination; (iii) influence of Kbarr strains on malolactic fermentation; and (iv) analysis of the aroma profile of T. delbrueckii white wine as compared with S. cerevisiae white wine

  • The new T. delbrueckii killer yeasts were reliably monitored during must fermentation by using spontaneous cyhR mutants, with the results being validated by complementary methods based on molecular polymorphisms or yeast cell morphology

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The non-Saccharomyces yeasts which are usually present in spontaneous must fermentations have been receiving ever more attention by the part of wine microbiologists because some of them can improve wine complexity. Torulaspora delbrueckii is probably the most commonly used in winemaking Controlled inoculation with this yeast is widely recommended for improving the complexity and for enhancing certain specific characteristics of wines (Jolly et al, 2006; Bely et al, 2008; Renault et al, 2009; Azzolini et al, 2012, 2015). No difference in the overall ester concentrations was found between mixed T. delbrueckii/S. cerevisiae and single S. cerevisiae inoculation, the level of some esters (ethyl 3-hydroxybutanoate, for instance) was higher in the mixed culture while that of others (such as isoamyl acetate) was lower (Azzolini et al, 2012) These apparently contradictory results concerning ester concentrations may depend on the proportion of each yeast species during must fermentation, or on the eventual occurrence of malolactic fermentation, neither of which possibilities were discussed in any depth by those authors. It has been shown that ester production by T. delbrueckii is strain dependent, and that the aromas resulting from this yeast can differ when it is associated with S. cerevisiae in mixed cultures (Renault et al, 2009)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call