Abstract

The treatment approach for soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) of the lower extremity has shifted toward the use of neoadjuvant radiation combined with limb-sparing surgery (LSS). The resulting defects often require reconstruction with free tissue transfer for adequate outcomes. Data has demonstrated a potential increased risk of microvascular complications for free flaps performed using irradiated recipient vessels. Similarly, certain anatomic areas of the lower extremity have a high proportion of unnamed perforators that are available as recipient vessels, increasing the technical difficulty. We aimed to determine if the characteristics of recipient vessels that were used for reconstruction of STS defects influenced rates of microvascular complications in our patients. A retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent reconstruction of lower extremity STS defects with free tissue transfer from 2009-2020 was conducted. Data regarding recipient vessel type (axial vessel vs. unnamed perforator), radiation status of the recipient vessels (irradiated vs. non-irradiated), and microvascular complications was compared across groups. A total of 204 free flaps were included. The overall microvascular complication rate was 13.7% (28 cases). Most microvascular complications were detected postoperatively (82.1%) rather than intraoperatively, with the majority involving venous congestion/thrombosis (20 cases, 71.4%). While there was a trend toward increased microvascular complications with the use of irradiated recipient vessels (27 cases, 96.4%), this did not reach statistical significance (OR = 1.98, p = 0.52). The use of perforating branches as recipient vessels did not confer increased risk of microvascular complications (OR = 0.87, p = 0.75). Reconstruction of irradiated lower extremity STS defects represents a particularly challenging issue. This analysis demonstrates that free tissue transfer can be safely performed using irradiated vessels without significant increased risk of microvascular complications. Furthermore, unnamed perforating branches can also be successfully used for reconstruction in anatomically challenging areas of the lower extremity.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.