Abstract
Monetary authorities also tend to take for granted that an increase in the money stock lowers interest rates. From their vantage point, an increase in the money stock by way of an open-market purchase tends to lower market rates quickly, since purchasing securities raises their prices and lowers yields. Indeed, they rely on this relation in order to control rates. Accordingly, interest-rate movements are frequently viewed as indicators of recent monetary policy. Since the money/interest-rate relation is used in implementing monetary policy, it is particularly important that the monetary authorities know how the relation works. If the monetary authorities believed that they lower interest rates by increasing the money stock whereas this at first lowers and then later raises rates, the authorities' actions would work first toward and then against an interest-rate goal. Further, if interest rates are viewed as indicators of monetary policy, incorrect conclusions can easily follow if total effects are disregarded in favor of initial effects. The trouble with using interest rates as indicators of monetary policy is as follows: If income increases faster than money, interest rates will tend to rise, but if the income increase results from increases in the money stock, should monetary policy be called restrictive?
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.