Abstract

One-time application of mixed fertilizer formed by the compounding of two controlled-release nitrogen fertilizers (CRUs) with targeted N supply during the periods from transplantation (TS) to panicle initiation (PI) and from PI to heading (HS) is expected to synchronize the double-peak N demand of rice. However, its effects on the yield and N use efficiency (NUE) of labor-intensive double-cropping rice were unknown. Two targeted CRU (CRUA and CRUB) were compounded in five ratios (CRUA: CRUB = 10:0, 7:3, 5:5, 3:7, and 0:10) to form five mixed fertilizers (BBFs): BBF1–5. A field experiment was performed to investigate the characteristics of N supply in early and late seasons under different BBFs and their effects on N uptake, yield, and ammonia volatilization (AV) loss from paddy fields of double-cropping rice. Conventional high-yield fertilization (CK, three split applications of urea) and zero-N treatments were established as controls. The N supply dropped significantly with the increased compound ratio of CRUB during the period from TS to PI, but increased during the period from PI to HS. With the exception of the period from TS to PI in the late rice season, the N uptake of early and late rice maintained close synchronicity with the N supply of BBFs during the double-peak periods. Excessive N supply (BBF1 and BBF2) in the late rice season during the period from TS to PI increased N loss by AV. The effect of BBF on grain yield increase varied widely between seasons, irrespective of year. Among the BBFs, the BBF2 treatment of early rice not only stabilized the spikelets per panicle but also ensured a high number of effective panicles by promoting N uptake during the period from TS to PI and a high grain-filling percentage by appropriately reducing the N supply at the later PI stage, resulting in the highest rice yield. While stabilizing the effective panicle number, the BBF4 treatment of late rice increased the number of spikelets per panicle by promoting N uptake during the period from PI to HS, resulting in the highest rice yield. The two-year average yield and apparent N recovery efficiency of the BBF2 treatment during the early rice season were 9.6 t ha−1 and 45.3%, while those of late rice in BBF4 were 9.6 t ha−1 and 43.0%, respectively. The yield and NUE indexes of BBF2 in early rice and BBF4 in late rice showed no significant difference from those of CK. The AVs of BBF2 during the early rice season and of BBF4 during the late rice season were 50.0% and 76.8% lower, respectively, than those of CK. BBF2 and BBF4 could effectively replace conventional urea split fertilization in early and late rice seasons, ensuring rice yield and NUE and reducing AV loss in paddy fields.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call